Over 58811
politifake

Religion Politics


SCIENCE VS RELIGION - One will fly you into space, the other will fly you into a building.


TAGS: religion science rationality
Rating: 3.24/5

More politifakes by Cadaver

kellyvanrijn - May 12, 2014, 11:58 am
The title should have been: Science vs Islam. Jews, Christians and Buddhists do not fly planes into buildings.
fauxnews - February 1, 2014, 9:34 pm
...but I know you didnt mean anything homophobic by that. I dont blame you for not wanting to be mistakened for one of them.Who would want to be one of THOSE homophobic losers.But you have nothing to worry about,it's not like you're one of them,right? X-D
fauxnews - February 1, 2014, 9:31 pm
Gee, OTC...I wish Arnnatz and StoneTools would've figured that out before running away from here like cowards, after getting banned TWICE for making homophobic remarks. Must make them mad that I can keep posting here while they can't. Such a shame...
OTC - February 1, 2014, 8:58 pm
Theatre uh? Always figured you to be a member of Film Actors Guild (F.A.G.)
fauxnews - January 31, 2014, 8:27 pm
Curious,Arnnatz..what else would you'think' I thought you said? Do you really think I would expect YOU of all people to compliment me on this forum by calling me"a Jedi"(lol)? Are you really (A)that dumb or (B)that desperate?Cant wait to hear this one lol
fauxnews - January 31, 2014, 8:20 pm
In theatre, a "farce" is a comedy that aims at entertaining the audience through situations that are highly exaggerated,extravagant,and thus improbable.Which is totally me on this forum.So,trust me. I knew what you meant.Have you seen my avatar lately?
fauxnews - January 31, 2014, 8:18 pm
*pfft* Whatever..I totally knew what you mean.haha..Are you serious? You really can't be that dumb. Do you even know what "farce" means? You're grasping for straws now.lol
OTC - January 31, 2014, 5:32 pm
Translation(fauxnews/sophia): I didn't realize it said farce, I need to start projecting big time!
fauxnews - January 31, 2014, 3:57 pm
Nah, doesn't suck at all. Why would I edit it? Taking this place too seriously and being pathologically insecure is your thing, Arnnatz. I can make a joke, even poke fun at myself, and not get b-utthurt over it like you do. Must "suck" that you can't,huh?
OTC - January 31, 2014, 3:42 pm
must suck not being able to edit your admitting that you are a farce
OTC - January 30, 2014, 5:33 pm
rofl, glad you agree!
fauxnews - January 30, 2014, 11:03 am
It is indeed, OTC. It is indeed.
OTC - January 30, 2014, 9:58 am
But the farce is strong with you.
fauxnews - January 28, 2014, 9:24 pm
Prepare for your mind to be blown...I don't believe in God AND I care a lot about what happens to others AND I don't like liberals. Want to see my next magic trick?
AlphaForce - January 28, 2014, 5:47 pm
Terrorists claim religion but they are not religious, even though they may think they are. I've never killed for Jesus. Mohammed would be turning in his grave if he knew what people are doing in his name.
AlphaForce - January 28, 2014, 5:45 pm
These cold heart killers don't believe in god so they don't care about what they do to people. I believe in God and I care for everyone. You sound like you don't believe in God you probably could care less what happens to other people.
AlphaForce - January 28, 2014, 5:44 pm
It isn't superstition. Science says I should be dead Science says my truck hit a tree. When in fact my vehicle held the road better than it ever did. My comment about religion in school isn't about stopping a bullet. It's about people caring more for life
fauxnews - January 28, 2014, 5:35 pm
Your superstition wouldn't prevent that tragedy from happening anymore than me using the force will control people's minds. See??? I just tried, again. Jessica Alba still won't sleep with me. The force is weak with this one.....:-p
fauxnews - January 28, 2014, 5:32 pm
???? How does prayer stop a bullet? Remind me again?? In fact, wouldn't that just incite fanatics who hate that religion to come into the school and attack enemies of that religion? Schools should be a religion free zone for a reason...common sense.
OTC - January 28, 2014, 5:22 pm
They flew into a building using science, so you're saying they are both evil?
AlphaForce - January 28, 2014, 3:29 am
No where does the bible say God says to kill innocent people. Frankly if we had prayer in school we wouldn't have so many senseless killings. Just last night a family of 3 was sh** and killed in a home invasion in my home town Ashtabula Ohio.


Bill Nye the Socialist Clown -




FACTUAL TRUTH - "Separation of church and state" is NOT in the Constitution. It is a liberal lie. Read it agian, fools.




LIBERAL THEOLOGY - If you pay taxes, you fund war, therefore you cannot get into heaven. Obama's apostle Michael Moore teaches us this.




The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations -




Liberal Science Deniers -




OLD POSTER - Continuous hypocrisy of the Religious right.




ISRAELI OFFICIAL TEARS UP BIBLE - Michael Ben Ari, an Israeli Right-wing lawmaker tears up 'abominable' book sent to him by a Christian organization & throws it in trash bin


TAGS: zionists israel religion bible devil
Rating: 2/5

More politifakes by SethMythrax

GrouchoMarxist - September 17, 2012, 4:18 pm
amazing
starryeyedguy - September 17, 2012, 10:56 am
And?
freasy - September 17, 2012, 9:16 am
So what, his perogative


CHRISTIANITY? - "The Almighty is very central in the life of my family. We attend prayer meetings at the Mosque, I mean Church, regularly."




Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -


TAGS: global warming consensus climate change hoax scam farce michael crichton junk science green religion alarmists warmists greenies al gore ipcc agenda21
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)


CHRISTIAN NATION? - THE LAST TIME WE MIXED POLITICS AND RELIGION PEOPLE GOT BURNED AT THE STAKE!




FORGIVENESS - "But I say unto you, love thy enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you." - JESUS




Double standards? Yeah, the Left has them in spades -




THE SWASTIKA - It has a most peculiar history.




RACISM - The only form of evolution Christians believe in




Climate Crusader DiCaprio -




LIBERALISM - IT'S A RELIGION




PAGAN - ANYONE WHO DOESN'T BELONG TO "YOUR" RELIGION




DICK CHENEY -




THE TEN COMMANDMENTS - Republicans love to preach them, but be damned if they ever abided them.




BLIND FAITH -




RELIGION - Should Be Used To Bring People Together. Not Blow Them Apart.




Day of Judgement -




Liberals defend Islam, but if you're a Christian, then you must be Satan ... -




Last Time I checked -


TAGS: politics not religion
Rating: 4.6/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - August 22, 2013, 11:18 pm
Said Mr Spam
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 21, 2013, 9:48 pm

I didn't stop him from posting at Religifake.
Curlyrocks - August 21, 2013, 2:46 pm
They stopped letting you spam religifake didn't they Vik. Anyway when and why did you "see the light" of atheism?
vbattaile - August 21, 2013, 7:43 am
completely irrelevant and useless poster
vbattaile - August 21, 2013, 7:42 am
http://www.politifake.org/the-bible-vik-battaile-politics-44852.html


AMISH BEARD CUTTING GETS 15YRS PRISON - Attack on religious groups begins, so much for freedom of religion.


TAGS: liberals assault religion
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by OTC

Renza - April 19, 2013, 7:43 am
That's really just kinda weak
OTC - April 19, 2013, 12:43 am
Typical, kinda like liberals don't care about black on black crimes because that can't be considered racist.
PapaFox - April 11, 2013, 8:53 pm
Wow, talk about fail. It was another Amish man who attacked him.


THE FUTURE MUST NOT BELONG - To those who slander the prophet of Islam ~Barack Hussein Obama 9/25/12


TAGS: islam state religion un piss mohammed
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by GrouchoMarxist

vbattaile - September 26, 2012, 12:42 am
Get the Mussulman Rookie OUT of the White House


Theocracy -


TAGS: theocracy church state religion constitution
Rating: 4.2/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Renza - May 25, 2013, 2:38 pm
very true.
Rudedog - May 24, 2013, 11:10 pm
Nice one CanMan


" NOW WHICH ONE WAS 'THE RELIGION OF PEACE' AGAIN? " - "Peace will come when the Arabs will love their children more than they hate us." - Golda Meir.




WALK THE WALK - If they want to play politics, let them pay like everyone else. (George Carlin 1937-2008)


TAGS: tax religions it s only fair
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by Rudedog

BobbEdwards - June 8, 2013, 11:03 am
Spoken in 1988, while Carlin was riffing about the Moral Majority and, quote, "Ronald Reagan and his criminal gang".
BobbEdwards - June 7, 2013, 11:03 pm
"You know what they oughta do with churches? Tax them! Tax them! If holy people are so interested in politics, government and public policy, let them pay the price of admission like everyone else". Underhanded job of taking Carlin's quote out of context.


Query -


TAGS: church state religion constitution conservative
Rating: 3.67/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Curlyrocks - May 26, 2013, 2:58 pm
No no no Cannabal we've tried to explain it to you but one more time, when Christians do it it's cool but other religions are false so how could they possibly be expected to make just laws?
Renza - May 26, 2013, 12:20 pm
Why yes, I believe that is something they would say.


The Wall Between Church and State -


TAGS: church state religion theocracy government
Rating: 3.67/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - May 24, 2013, 11:52 pm
Forgive me, I couldn't shorten the quote without it losing its impact.
Rudedog - May 24, 2013, 11:07 pm
Almost scrolled past the Vik poster. Glad I didn't.
Cannabal - May 24, 2013, 8:13 pm
I just couldn't truncate the quote. And rest a**ured, I insist on being succinct.
Curlyrocks - May 24, 2013, 8:12 pm
5L, But don't fall for the allure of the 500 page "poster" keep it short and sweet.


WAR - "All who take the sword shall perish with the sword." - JESUS


TAGS: jesus religion war violence death
Rating: 3.64/5

More politifakes by blesic

birddseedd - August 28, 2014, 6:55 pm
so we gave them to friends of terrorists... as you said, "plan the whole time"
Curlyrocks - August 28, 2014, 6:50 pm
furios. And we where giving the weapons in Syria to the FSA, that rag tag group of freedom fighters, then ISIS "hijacked" them. Like that wasn't the plan the whole time.
Curlyrocks - August 28, 2014, 6:48 pm
We didn't give them the trucks, the Iraqi army gave them the trucks we gave to them. Same with tanks and other equipment. And from what I understand those weapons from Mexico have already been used to attack border guards hence why we know about fast and
birddseedd - August 28, 2014, 4:07 pm
from what iv seen we are giving them trucks. and of course all of the firearms we are sending to mexico and syria. only a matter of time till they are used against us. already seen reports of bans of armed illegals roaming the country. many in MI
Curlyrocks - August 28, 2014, 12:20 pm
Saudi Arabia..... well us since we fuel up on their oil daily (if your on the eastern sea bord).
birddseedd - August 28, 2014, 10:11 am
yea but now we have isis. and youll never guess who is funding them
birddseedd - August 25, 2014, 12:32 am
cant say i know much on that side of the world, other than their hatred for guns, self defense and civil liberties. well im off to bed. ill be back tomorrow. its been a nice convo. see ya tomorrow
Curlyrocks - August 25, 2014, 12:29 am
slowly (very slowly) toning down on the terror. I guess it's hard to top the Sunni terrorists with the whole 9/11 thing under their belt, followed by the US taking out strict dictators and leaving nations open to Sunni extremists.
birddseedd - August 25, 2014, 12:28 am
thats not going to change. the muslim faith is one of hate and dominance. iv read it in the quran myself. saidly, most religions are the source of most of the hate in the world. hamas will not negotiate. they wont even wait out cease fires before shooting
birddseedd - August 25, 2014, 12:26 am
I cant say much about the Iraqie people, as far as palistines in gaza, they hate the jews themselves. iv watched their childrens television shows. they indoctrinate their children to hate jews and attack on site.
Curlyrocks - August 25, 2014, 12:25 am
well that's just a h** bed of hate. They commit genocide against there fellow Muslims like Kurds so no people with that much hate in their hearts must be stopped. But Hamas is trying to negotiate, Iran is now trying to negotiate, ****e muslims seem to be
Curlyrocks - August 25, 2014, 12:23 am
There are 12 synagogues operating in Iran, most of the hate over there is directed at the state and government of Israel than at the jewish people themselves. At least from "Organized" Muslim governments when it comes to psycho militants like ISIS...
birddseedd - August 25, 2014, 12:16 am
but in all fairness. i do understand your point. and the jews are no saints by any means. i think that might be an ironic statement. but no, they are not completely innocent, but genocide certainly is not the answer
birddseedd - August 25, 2014, 12:15 am
when genocide is the alternative, no, there is no time to let it go.
birddseedd - August 25, 2014, 12:13 am
actually, if you want my honest to goodness opinion, if the Indians did have the ability to take back the country, i would likely be in support of it. what we did to them was no better than what king George did to us. probably worse honestly.
Curlyrocks - August 25, 2014, 12:11 am
and I have had my laptop stolen, I wanted blood at the time but it's been 2 years, I let it go, maybe 2000 years is enough time to let it go?
Curlyrocks - August 25, 2014, 12:08 am
money or chase an immigrant family off their land?
Curlyrocks - August 25, 2014, 12:07 am
I hope you're not American because by your logic you should be on the 1st plane back to Europe or where ever you came from. But if you are I a**ume your family has not lived there for many generations so what are you going to do? buy a house with some ...
Curlyrocks - August 25, 2014, 12:04 am
are equally violent.
birddseedd - August 25, 2014, 12:03 am
sorry, i shoudld have waited to see if you were done. but i would have to disagree. history shows that they have NEVER lived in peace. as for "paying for it" should you have to pay for your laptop to get it back from the thief?
Curlyrocks - August 25, 2014, 12:01 am
Pay for it. Jews Christians and Muslims all tend to live in relative peace in the ME until 1 group decides it needs to control the land with an iron fist. When things like the crusades or the current occupation happen the responses from the other groups..
birddseedd - August 25, 2014, 12:01 am
the problem is, those people first stole the land from isreal. if someone breaks into your house and steels your computer, and the police find it, wont you want it back? or would that just be steeling? pretty sure you woudl want what is yours back.
Curlyrocks - August 24, 2014, 11:57 pm
It doesn't matter what kind of deals where made on an international level or what some ancient book says, when you kick people off of land they have been living on for generations it's called theft. The only fair way to acquire something you want is ...
birddseedd - August 24, 2014, 8:19 pm
and where would you have them go anyway? because the other nations are not interested in Isreal, they are interested in genocide. no matter where they were to go, the arabs will try to eradicate them.
birddseedd - August 24, 2014, 8:18 pm
Maybe that is the point we should be discussing, because it does belong to them. it was theirs long before any current nation was formed. as i said, its called "Isreal" for a reason. it does in fact belong to the Jews.
blesic - August 24, 2014, 8:11 pm
It's not THEIR LAND. The land was there long before the Jews were and it will be there long after they are gone. So, arguing over who owns it is like 2 fleas arguing over who owns the dog they live on.
birddseedd - August 24, 2014, 7:44 pm
why should they leave THEIR LAND? if your neighborhood got together and voted and said that they just didnt like you and they were voting you out, should you have to leave YOUR HOUSE?
blesic - August 24, 2014, 7:42 pm
The alternative is for them to get the hell out and bring peace to the region. Democracy states that the majority rules. Since the Jews are in the minority in the region, they either abide by Arabic rule or get the hell out!
birddseedd - August 24, 2014, 4:22 pm
That is why it is called Isreal, named after the father of the people who now live there, whose name was Isreal. By all rights, the land belongs to them. what else can they do but to protect it? what alternative can you suggest?
birddseedd - August 24, 2014, 4:21 pm
as far as peace goes. i have read enough of the quran to know that as long as there are non islamic people in existence, there will not be peace. they tried to exterminate the jews the same as hitler and countless others
birddseedd - August 24, 2014, 4:19 pm
I think you are forgetting one bit thing, the holocaust. The land belonged to the jews long before arabs ever came to town. who then removed the jews, trying to kill all of them. some time after hitler did the same. the fact is, the land was and is theirs
blesic - August 24, 2014, 1:34 pm
Well, I can say this. The only reason that the Jews are in Israel now is that after WWII the West stole that land from the Arabs and gave it to the Jews. Therefore, the only way there will be peace in that region is if the Jews move out!
birddseedd - August 24, 2014, 10:00 am
thats all you have to say?
blesic - August 24, 2014, 1:31 am
Bravo
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 10:10 pm
Nobody likes the idea of having to defend yourself. personally or nationally. but the fact remains. the terrorists and even governments all around them... are very happy to kill every one of them from babies to men. without mercy, with hate and prejudice
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 10:10 pm
Nobody likes the idea of having to defend yourself. personally or nationally. but the fact remains. the terrorists and even governments all around them... are very happy to kill every one of them from babies to men. without mercy, with hate and prejudice
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 10:09 pm
for one. being a military state is not good, but on the other hand. they are under constant attack. no they are not 100% innocent, however it is the other people that are initiating the attacks on them. isreal is defending themselves.
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 10:08 pm
However. isreal is sourrounded by nations that want to irraticate them, simply because they have a religion that hates them. so they are kind of a 2 edged blade....
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 10:06 pm
Many of the isrealites feel the same. there are many people that there that hate being a military state. and there are many things that isreal is doing wrong. even isrealites will tell you that.
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 10:06 pm
Many of the isrealites feel the same. there are many people that there that hate being a military state. and there are many things that isreal is doing wrong. even isrealites will tell you that.
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 10:05 pm
now. as far as today. thats when the two sides come in. ill start by saying that being a military state is never a good thing. and i do not believe that is Gods intent for them. unfortunatly that is what is happening here in the usa
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 10:04 pm
hmm. there are two sides to it. the first side. God made a judgement on the people isreal was supposed to wipe out in the bible days. in fact not doing so is the reason they are having to fight today.
blesic - August 23, 2014, 10:01 pm
The Jews have been a war-like people ever since Abram came to Israel many years ago and exterminated everyone who lived there. And today the Jews are still a militant people. Nothing has changed.
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 9:50 pm
what he meant by what he said. i should say.
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 9:50 pm
Ok, so we are going to do this like liberal extreemests? ignore facts, pretend we are right, then move the conversation on? how about you talk about the things i stated, then we can discuss your last comment and what christ actually meant.
blesic - August 23, 2014, 6:11 pm
So sorry but you are wrong again. Remember what Rabbi Jesus said, "If a man hits you on the left cheek, turn the right cheek to him also."
blesic - August 23, 2014, 6:11 pm
So sorry but you are wrong again. Remember what Rabbi Jesus said, "If a man hits you on the left cheek, turn the right cheek to him also."
blesic - August 23, 2014, 6:11 pm
So sorry but you are wrong again. Remember what Rabbi Jesus said, "If a man hits you on the left cheek, turn the right cheek to him also."
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 5:55 pm
mediacdn.disqus.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/430/4839/original.jpg
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 5:50 pm
non violence has its place, which ends just before you or the ones you love become murdered.
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 5:49 pm
by your logic, isreal would simply allow the palistines to bomb them out of existence. is that really your solution? just let everyone die, man child baby woman? because if so, you would be akin to a psychopath.
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 5:47 pm
You are also incorrect about isreal. the palistines are attacking Isreal. You need to know the difference between Attacking and Defending. because by your logic, to be continued....
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 5:46 pm
As far as Jesus goes, the act of defending yourself, is far from war mongering. Christ never advocated for war. in fact his principals show that using what we call violence, is the LAST resort to defending yourself
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 5:44 pm
That is a really backward way of thinking you know that right? I believe in being non violent each and every time. However there are times when your attacker does not give you any choice and you are forced to defend yourself
blesic - August 23, 2014, 5:41 pm
If those are the facts, that means Luke and Jesus were a couple of war mongering Jews just like the ones we have today invading Gaza.
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 11:14 am
because when you make stuff up, it just shows anyone with a brain that you simply do not use yours.
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 11:13 am
Luke 22:35-38, 36 Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. seriously, if you are going to say things, you need to use facts and data
blesic - August 23, 2014, 9:05 am
Christ didn't tell people to buy no sword because he was poor and all his friends were poor.
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 8:27 am
But hey, as long as you can missquote something you refuse to read, maybe your right, we should let isis take over the white house
birddseedd - August 23, 2014, 8:25 am
Again. If you have to say more things that are untrue, your point is invalid. And to be honest i dont think you have a firm grasp on the reality of what you are talking about. On a side note, christ told people to buy a sword
blesic - August 23, 2014, 1:04 am
My point is right. You're just a hypocrite like all conservatives clutching their guns and bibles.
birddseedd - August 8, 2014, 12:10 pm
If you have to misquote and lie, your point is wrong


STAUNCH ATHEIST - "The concept of God is degrading to a man."


TAGS: ayn rand religion atheism communism
Rating: 3.5/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Renza - March 7, 2013, 12:30 pm
If it were said that the concept of *needing* god is degrading to man, I would agree entirely.
Doggit - March 7, 2013, 10:28 am
No shades of grey with Ayn.


THE UNDENIABLE TRUTH - "The government of the United States is not in any sense founded upon the Christian religion." - President John Adams, 1796




YEAH!!! -




Separation of Church and State -




religion: tax exempt cash business -




Bible a faith-inspired text authored by man -




JEFFERSON'S BIBLE - It never caught on: it lacked that Old Testament wrath that is always so very popular with people.




NOSTRADAMUS - The one Frenchman Americans don't hate who wrote books on witchcraft that remain unburned.




GROUND ZERO IMAM A SLUMLORD - The ground zero Imam is a slumlord- and is reportedly getting public funding for his mosque. Priceless! What a country!!




FREEDOM OF RELIGION - So long as you're not Moslem, of course.




Mental Illness -




WHY... - Why do some people choose to forget this?


TAGS: freedom religion
Rating: 2.82/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

PapaFox - December 5, 2012, 3:57 pm
As long as we don't fall into the trap of treating ALL Muslims as though they were terrorists. Most don't follow the gospel of hate any more than most Christians. Hopefully we learned something from Japanese American internment in WWII.
simplegenius - December 5, 2012, 1:31 pm
when a religion wants to pursue mass killings against others just based on non-practice of it, I believe that we should consider limiting it's freedom. That's just me though.. the crusades were for land and riches, Muslim terrorism is for martyrdom.
PapaFox - December 5, 2012, 8:30 am
Strangely enough, one of the reasons we have church/state separation in the first place is due to mutual distrust between Christian denominations at the time.
PapaFox - December 5, 2012, 8:29 am
Though unintended, that is one of the effects. Another way to look at it is "freedom from religious harassment," be they Christian, Jewish, Muslim... or atheist.
JGalt - December 5, 2012, 12:12 am
liberals change things- such as "Freedom FROM religion" is their interpretation of it!
TheConstitutionalist - December 4, 2012, 5:38 pm
Thank you for a post that is not only correct but also not from Vic. LOL
TheConstitutionalist - December 4, 2012, 5:38 pm
Thank you for a post that is not only correct but also not from Vic. LOL


RELIGION - In politics, it's more dangerous than a loaded gun.




THE HOLY BIBLE - That it is still relevant today is a sign of how very little progress we have made.




Church -


TAGS: church religion creationism conservative republican
Rating: 2.71/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Renza - April 25, 2013, 6:04 pm
We could only be so lucky...
Curlyrocks - April 25, 2013, 4:12 pm
Now if only government could operate free of intrusion from them.


JUST SAY NO - The perfect attitude everyone should take toward furthering medical research.




FREEDOM OF RELIGION - Means ALL religions, including "none of the above." No special favors FOR ANYONE, no matter how loud they whine.


TAGS: freedom of religion
Rating: 2.5/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Curlyrocks - May 1, 2013, 10:10 pm
You got a point there, but when you look at a lot of the charity work those people have done, it does give them an authority on being a good person, but like I have said before it is all on an individual basis.
PapaFox - May 1, 2013, 7:04 pm
From my perspective, anybody who comes to my door telling me I'll go to hell if I don't believe as they do should feel lucky that they walk away with their own teeth.
Renza - May 1, 2013, 6:03 pm
Also, dunno bout you, but someone who goes door to door harassing people about believing in one imaginary friend or another with the threat of eternal torment, really doesn't sound like someone to take advice from on being a better person.
Renza - May 1, 2013, 6:02 pm
Big difference on the christians vs atheists imo though. Christians try to force their religion upon others and try to put the religion into law. Atheists/agnostics try to protect themselves from other peoples religions.
Curlyrocks - May 1, 2013, 5:33 pm
Not a sh** at this poster in particular but the billboards they put up
Curlyrocks - May 1, 2013, 5:32 pm
I've heard plenty of other atheists b**** wine and cry about the billboards and nativity scenes. In the end instead of making posters to mock people for their beliefs we should be doing what Jehovah Witness do and publish info on how to be a better person
PapaFox - December 4, 2012, 8:57 am
No surprisingly, he makes yet another childish comment and runs away from the real issue. Do keep it up though, you're and endless source of amusement. :-D
foxrecon19d - December 4, 2012, 8:15 am
There, there, PF. Your Obamassiah is here to protect you from that nasty old US Constitution. Here. Blow your nose on this copy of the First Amendment.


Islamofascist Sympathizer -


TAGS: ben franklin islamofascism religion muslim
Rating: 2.43/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - April 26, 2013, 7:36 pm
Mmmmmmmm, no, that's not what he said.
Oyster - April 26, 2013, 6:32 am
Perhaps he meant that there would be a minister next to him, countering the message, hence the pulpit reference.
Cannabal - April 25, 2013, 6:26 am
Well, looks like me have a Chechen-Islamofascist-terrorist sympathizer.
PapaFox - April 25, 2013, 6:24 am
Religious freedom applies to everyone.


THERE'S A THOUGHT... - Hopefully it's not too politically offensive...


TAGS: religion
Rating: 2.33/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

simplegenius - December 5, 2012, 1:32 pm
would not close my eyes long enough to pray around a muslim extremist.
simplegenius - December 5, 2012, 1:32 pm
would not close my eyes long enough to pray around a muslim extremist.


Leave politics out of religion. -


TAGS: religion politics
Rating: 2.25/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - August 6, 2014, 3:04 pm
Agreed.
EmmaRoydes - August 6, 2014, 2:30 pm
I'm not finding anything on psychological problems with Pavlo Lapshyn, though I agree that anyone who does that kind of **** is clearly mentally impaired regardless of what the court says.
fauxnews - August 6, 2014, 2:22 pm
Neither do I, mate....hence the word extremists.The problem is that you are being a 'bigot' and attacking the religious part too.That's why I always make sure to use the word fundamentalist after I make an indictment.The extremist part that makes em bad
fauxnews - August 6, 2014, 2:20 pm
And I'm sure 99% of Muslim 'extremists' aren't playing with a full deck either. Anyone who blows up people, shoots up a shopping mall, blows up a govt building with a van bomb (ie. McVeigh) clearly has 'something' wrong with them...
EmmaRoydes - August 6, 2014, 9:24 am
Dr. Ulrik Malt, Professor of Psychiatry said that Breivik suffered from Asperger syndrome, Tourette syndrome, narcissistic personality disorder and possibly paranoid psychosis.
EmmaRoydes - August 6, 2014, 9:06 am
You forgot to mention that Anders Behring Breivik was diagnosed first as a paranoid schizophrenic, then as having narcissistic personality disorder. Modifiers that make a difference when blaming religion for his horrific actions.
posterman - August 6, 2014, 7:31 am
there you go again faux;avoiding intelligent debate, with no reply about the zealots who want to destroy Israel and kill Americans Unlike you I have no respect for these cowardly terrorists
fauxnews - August 6, 2014, 2:45 am
I now return you to your regularly scheduled program. :-)
fauxnews - August 6, 2014, 2:44 am
There are extremists in every walk of life. I know this because I'm talking to one right now... you. You are a religious bigot mocking Muslims for the sport of it. Many of my friends are peaceful, law abiding Muslims. Out of respect for them...F*** off.
fauxnews - August 6, 2014, 2:41 am
Xtian extremists have caused the deaths of countless innocent women through the witch hunts. Xtian "extremists" caused the deaths of thousands in the inquisitions. Xtian extremist Anders Behring Breivik murdered 90+ people. You "evidence" is selective...
posterman - August 6, 2014, 1:05 am
Oh really? All religions the same? 12 years of Catholic school no prob.Friends and family of various religions never a problem...no one stoned or beheaded. so tell me how islam is a religion of peace;the evidence shows otherwise


NATIONAL DAY OF PRAYER - Conservatively speaking, this day is not only unconstitutional; it is also wholly unnecessary.




THE ELEPHANT - The symbol of American castist hierarchy




WESTBORO CHURCH - Must be the American way if Terrorism is the Muslim way. One must paint all with the same brush if all Muslims are Terrorists, Right?


TAGS: terrror religion ignorance stupidity brainwashed
Rating: 1.8/5

More politifakes by SethMythrax

SethMythrax - September 22, 2012, 5:32 am
Hutaree militia us another group of christian nuts, but only 3 of the 8 were found guilty....
GrouchoMarxist - September 17, 2012, 4:22 pm
specifically
GrouchoMarxist - September 17, 2012, 4:21 pm
More specically democrats
crankyhead - September 17, 2012, 7:27 am
...fit all cozy and snug into your well insulated narrative.
crankyhead - September 17, 2012, 7:27 am
Not even from the Irish republican army? What about some of the mass lynchings in the south? I'm sure you could find instances of groups of more than 21 christians behaving un-christian-like, if you could be bothered to read something that didn't...
JGalt - September 16, 2012, 11:21 pm
I can't recall any others, nor 21 Christian terrorists commiting a single act on the same day... thanks for playing. Next time, cite some sources for your opinions!
romneyisatool - September 16, 2012, 7:07 pm
Timothy McVeigh was a Xtian terrorist who blew up a government building. Hitler compared himself to Christ. Anders Behring Breivik is another famous Christian terrorist as of late. There are just as many Xtian terrorists as there are Muslim ones.Nuff said
GrouchoMarxist - September 16, 2012, 3:10 pm
Catholics are mentioned where?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 16, 2012, 2:52 pm

He's not talking lib or con, he saying that if all Muslims are terrorists then all Catholics are bigoted psychos.
foxrecon19d - September 16, 2012, 9:20 am
You've missed the point entirely. We have declared war against TERRORISM. That the DEMOCRATS equate that with a war against Muslims proves that it is the Democrats that are painting with a very broad and bigotted brush.
GrouchoMarxist - September 16, 2012, 8:42 am
Don't know what you've attempted to hit here with this other democrat group.... but you certainly missed


ISLAMIC TERROR IN EUROPE - Islamic terrorism is perceived as being the biggest threat worldwide yet the EU only faced one Islamist terrorist attack in 2008. Separatist terrorism, not Islamic affects the EU most.


TAGS: attacks terror death religion fear
Rating: 1.44/5

More politifakes by SethMythrax

foxrecon19d - September 16, 2012, 3:06 pm
In 2008, I visited my sister in Germany. In Hnnover, 50,000 Islamists protested in the streets while British musicians performed concerts proclaiming that "SHARIA LAW IS THE ONLY WAY FOR PEACE!"
foxrecon19d - September 16, 2012, 3:01 pm
Unfortunately, this graph is true...but there is a reason why. The EU, Germany, Spain and Great Britain, are trading security for adopting Islamic Sharia Law. Classis Chicago policitcs on a grand scale..
GrouchoMarxist - September 16, 2012, 11:14 am
Source


DEMONCRAT RUN CITY -




PROFESSIONALISM -




#Religionofpeace -




Albert Gore -




Weapons-Grade Global Warming Stupidity -




Terrorism Has No Religion -




Commiefornia Gov. Moonbeam Proves Yet Again He's a Moronic Moonbat -




Eco-Fascists: The "Green Wing" of the Nazi Party -


TAGS: eco fascists green wing nazi party green religion greenies alarmists warmists socialism climate change junk science global warming scam agenda21 hysterians
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 27, 2015, 3:40 am
"A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire :P
fauxnews - April 26, 2015, 11:04 pm
"I have a theory that you can make any sentence seem profound by writing the name of a dead philosopher at the end of it. -Plato." (Banksy) www.twitter.com/SteveCarell/status/583642179710496769
calron - April 26, 2015, 7:59 pm
"There is perhaps no phenomenon which contains so much destructive feeling as moral indignation, which permits envy or hate to be acted out under the guise of virtue." — Erich Fromm


Grandma Clinton To Make 'Climate Change' A Top Agenda Item -




Democrat War On Coal -




Global Warming Junk Science -




The Ever-Greater Pause -




The Father of Global Warming -




An Inconvenient Truth -




Whiny Liberal Crybabies Throw a Wet Blanket on the 4th of July Because It's Bad for Gaia -




Climate Change -




Climategate -




I'll Observe Earth Day... -




The Father of Global Warming -




Climate Change Idiocy -




Climate Change Clown -




EPA Tyrant: "Yes, Our New Regulations Are Going to Make Lower Income People Take it in the A$$" -




Obsequious Totalitarian Dhimmitude -




Apollo 7 Astronaut: Climate Alarmism Is the ‘Biggest Fraud in the Field of Science’ -


TAGS: climate change alarmism apollo 7 astronaut walter cunningham usmc global warming fruad hoax scientific consensus green religion greenies alarmists warmists hysterians junk science eco fascism nasa ipcc
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - May 4, 2015, 12:17 am
Looks like An Appeal to Irrelevant Authority with a side of Person Credulity.


1970s Flashback -




Wacky Warmists -




EPA's Green Tyranny -




Greenpeace Hypocrisy -




The TRUTH about Dr. Wei-Hock Soon -




Global Warming Alarmists' New Claim: Satellites Are Lying -


TAGS: global warming hoax satellite temperature data climate change scam junk science the pause warmists alarmists hysterians ipcc nasa al gore john christy deniers skeptics greenies green religion eco fascism
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - February 12, 2016, 2:12 am
There is also the U.S. Climate Reference Network USCRN witch [sic] is supposed to be so accurate that its numbers never need adjusting. It shows a declaine in US temp where the adjusted number show an increase.


Warmist Stupidity -




The Party of Science -




Another Failed Global Warming Prophecy -




The Pope's Preposterous Priorities -


TAGS: pope francis global warming stupidity climate change hoax warmists greenies alarmists green religion catholic church
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - June 22, 2015, 12:05 am
My his egotistically spouting off. Existence will be here long after we're gone.


Radical Environmentalism Seeks Death Of Capitalism -




Global Warming Hysterian -


TAGS: al gore global warming hysterian climate change hoax scam fraud green religion greenies alarmists warmists ipcc inconvenient truth eco fascism junk science
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - May 3, 2015, 11:49 pm
There's a reason I call Gore The Profit of Global Warming. He made a lot of dough off the hysteria he spreads, but that doesn't make the theory itself invalid.


Climate Alarmism -




Alarmists, Alinskyites & Rules For Radicals -




Junk Scientist -




Junk Scientist -




A Scientist Who Reversed His Belief In Global Warming -




Climate Change: The Greatest Hoax Of The Modern Era -




Atheist Conservatives -




PREV PAGENEXT PAGE